投稿時間:2023-01-09 05:22:36 RSSフィード2023-01-09 05:00 分まとめ(22件)

カテゴリー等	サイト名等	記事タイトル・トレンドワード等	リンクURL	頻出ワード・要約等/検索ボリューム	登録日
Ruby	Rubyタグが付けられた新着投稿 - Qiita	カテゴリーごとの一覧表示	https://qiita.com/miki0221/items/f564f2ac1c1da2abcf70	記録	2023-01-09 04:02:29
海外TECH	MakeUseOf	How to Fix the Webcam Camera Error Code 0xA00F4289 in Windows 10 & 11	https://www.makeuseof.com/fix-webcam-camera-error-code-0xa00f4289-windows/	error	2023-01-08 19:15:15
Apple	AppleInsider - Frontpage News	Lion Energy Power Bank review: Not an ordinary power source	https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/01/08/lion-energy-power-bank-review-not-an-ordinary-power-source?utm_medium=rss	Lion Energy Power Bank review Not an ordinary power sourceThe Lion Energy Power Bank is more than your typical power source thanks to its rugged construction and illuminating features When you think of what a power bank can do you usually think of a portable power supply that charges your devices While that is usually what most of them overall do the Lion Energy Power Bank offers more than you may expect from just charging your iPhone Charging is just scratching the surface of what the Energy Power Bank can do and while it is not the thinnest power bank out there it does make up for it with the features that it offers Read more	2023-01-08 19:08:58
医療系	医療介護 CBnews	2024年度改定に向けての論点はこれだ-先が見えない時代の戦略的病院経営（187）	https://www.cbnews.jp/news/entry/20230106182857	不確実性	2023-01-09 05:00:00
ニュース	BBC News - Home	Bolsonaro supporters storm Brazilian Congress	https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-64204860?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA	bolsonaro	2023-01-08 19:42:10
ニュース	BBC News - Home	Aston Villa 1-2 Stevenage: League Two side produce stunning late comeback	https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64198131?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA	aston	2023-01-08 19:19:45
ニュース	BBC News - Home	FA Cup highlights: Aston Villa 1-2 Stevenage	https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/64165608?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA	aston	2023-01-08 19:12:17
ニュース	BBC News - Home	Watch: Sportscene - Scottish Premiership highlights	https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/64155021?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA	sportscene	2023-01-08 19:12:35
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	2023年の「お金」大全！投資、年金、保険、住宅ローン…経済リスクに慌てない必須ノウハウ - 「お金」大全	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315616	年の「お金」大全投資、年金、保険、住宅ローン…経済リスクに慌てない必須ノウハウ「お金」大全経済は動乱期に入った。	2023-01-09 04:50:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	GAFAMの生き残り戦略？日本だからこそ期待できる“健全な”メタバース - 企業サバイバル最前線	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/314814	facebook	2023-01-09 04:45:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	確定申告で絶対やってはいけない「控除使い残し損」、社会保険料の節税3要点【再編集】 - 確定申告で損する人、得する人	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/314344	確定申告	2023-01-09 04:40:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	「日東駒専・産近甲龍」復活の理由、30年間の私大志願者数ランキングに見る栄枯盛衰 - Diamond Premiumセレクション	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315760	「日東駒専・産近甲龍」復活の理由、年間の私大志願者数ランキングに見る栄枯盛衰DiamondPremiumセレクション近年、難化が指摘される日東駒専と産近甲龍。	2023-01-09 04:35:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	ドル円が年始に130円割れ、それでも「128円」が2023年の下限と考えられる理由 - 政策・マーケットラボ	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315655	円高ドル安	2023-01-09 04:30:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	年収が高い会社ランキング2022最新版【中国＆四国地方トップ5】ファストリ、ベネッセを凌ぐ1位は？ - ニッポンなんでもランキング！	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315739	上場企業	2023-01-09 04:25:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	年収が高い会社ランキング2022最新版【中国＆四国地方・100社完全版】マツダやサンマルクは何位？ - ニッポンなんでもランキング！	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315717		2023-01-09 04:25:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	列車遅延で乗客が暴徒化、戦後ストの転機「上尾事件」はなぜ起きた？ - News&Analysis	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315714	newsampampanalysis	2023-01-09 04:20:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	夫婦「完全別財布」な共働き世帯はまずい！年初こそFPが伝えたいこと - “残念サラリーマン”のお金相談所	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315697	共働き夫婦	2023-01-09 04:15:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	仕事ができる“解像度が高い”人はやっている「分解思考」とは - 要約の達人　from flier	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315687	fromflier	2023-01-09 04:10:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	「就活サイト」をどう使いこなす？三つのパターンと特徴を徹底解剖 - 親と子の「就活最前線」	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315734	解剖	2023-01-09 04:07:00
ビジネス	ダイヤモンド・オンライン - 新着記事	レクサスRX新型、「RXを壊せ」の変革で大人の余裕を実現したFスポーツ【試乗記】 - CAR and DRIVER 注目カー・ファイル	https://diamond.jp/articles/-/315684	caranddriver	2023-01-09 04:05:00
ビジネス	東洋経済オンライン	関東と関西で大きく違う｢電車内の迷惑行為｣ 朝夕の混雑が復活し､気になる点が増えてきた | 通勤電車 | 東洋経済オンライン	https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/644298?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=http&utm_campaign=link_back	日本民営鉄道協会	2023-01-09 04:30:00
海外TECH	reddit	If BBBY wanted to protect information about a potential M&A through the "missing" S-4/As, a Confidential Treatment Order (CTO) is actually not even necessary! Also confirmed we are still within the period before the SEC is required themselves to publicise any such discussion with BBBY about M&A disc	https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/106rcy5/if_bbby_wanted_to_protect_information_about_a/	If BBBY wanted to protect information about a potential M amp A through the quot missing quot S As a Confidential Treatment Order CTO is actually not even necessary Also confirmed we are still within the period before the SEC is required themselves to publicise any such discussion with BBBY about M amp A discI am referring here to the original post on this topic by u DanDJR regarding the quot missing quot S A filings for the bond deal extensions announced on December th and th The theory here being that BBBY may have requested for a Confidential Treatment Order CTO to be effected by the SEC so that any information in these two filings related to an M amp A is not made public There was some controversy over whether S A filings are even required for deadline extensions and I made a post that shows some precedent of this type of situation However there was one other thing bugged me about the whole quot Missing S As and CTO quot theory Namely where the CTOs themselves are as I believe the SEC publishes a notification of these being in effect on its EDGAR filing database if a company s request for one is accepted For example here is a link to the CTO for one requested last year by Tesla for an extension of a previous CTO As is very evident in BBBY s filings on EDGAR the two missing S As are still missing However for the CTO theory to be correct I was thinking there should be a CTO filed on or just before December th However with this also missing I was thinking it may invalidate the theory But then u DanDJR made a couple of posts sharing his correspondence with an anonymous source who had also carried out some research in this area One of the points they made is that a CTO has days to be reviewed by the SEC Never one to just accept a quot trust me bro quot I decided to check if this is correct and believe this is likely accurate I found the same time period provided by some law firms which specialises in giving guidance to companies for this area And also on this more general site with market related information If the form is appropriately filled by the companies planning for a merger and sent for review the SEC provides the comments within business days of filling Once a comment is passed subsequent amendments may be required The comments are generally passed within ten business days Let us say an S A was filed by BBBY on th December which this time included additional information that hints at an M amp A Or that a completely fresh S was filed on that same date which supplanted and added to the one detailing the Earnings Offering for the bond deal In that case with this maximum business days review period we are still comfortably within the period before the CTO has to be filed to EDGAR And if there are any comments clarification discussions needed between the SEC and BBBY potentially would be quite some time yet Therefore I believe the lack of a CTO being filed does not invalidate the quot Missing S A quot theory And from conducting this additional research I found out something else that is important CTOs are now even no longer necessary in situations where companies want to protect such information from going public through SEC mandatory filings It appears the SEC made some changes in which now no longer requires these to be filed separately but instead just to include some notes on whichever form is being submitted to make such a request Effective April the exhibit rules were updated to eliminate the requirement to submit a confidential treatment request to the SEC in most situations in which companies would be required to file material agreements containing commercially sensitive terms Companies may redact confidential information from versions of agreements filed as exhibits with periodic reports and registration statements without a confidential treatment request This also explains something that previously puzzled me about this whole theory which was why there were so few CTOs filed on EDGAR last year when I did a search The reason is the above which is they are mostly defunct now In fact the only fresh CTO filings made these days appeared to be for getting extensions of old ones Sure enough that seems to be exactly correct as per that same guidance article If less than three years have passed following the issuance of the initial order and thus a copy of the unredacted agreement remains in the possession of the SEC companies are allowed to submit a short one page extension request in lieu of the more fulsome request otherwise required by Rules and b to extend confidential treatment TL DR So basically this means BBBY would not have even had to make a separate CTO request if the updated S As included some information regarding a potential M amp A With it possible to make a confidentiality request within the filing itself even more straightforward to protect such sensitive information Hence allied to the relatively long review period for S A filings of up to business days I do believe the quot Missing S A quot theory is definitely still in play EDIT I want to add this comment I made as a response to a point made about whether the quot Missing S A quot theory is fundamental to the possibility of an M amp A Well one thing I should point put is that it is not really necessary at all for an M amp A thesis to be valid For all we know there have been discussions happening between BBBY and other parties but not yet at the concrete stage where any official filing with the SEC is required i e through an S registration Hence although the quot missing quot S As are indeed intriguing even if they were to suddenly appear right now and there is no hint of an M amp A contained within them does not dispel the possibility of an M amp A at all submitted by u Region Formal to r BBBY link comments	2023-01-08 19:10:08